After the American war for independence, the Continental Congress recognized the need to continue the practice. The granting of commissions became more commonplace under the British Empire. The commission was a lawful extension of sovereign power. In the Middle Ages, sovereigns would offer noblemen commissions to raise armies to protect the realm. The commissioning of officers has a long history and can be traced back to the Roman Empire. officer commission is a constitutional imperative and must be understood in both legal and professional contexts. They often perform similar or identical tasks, especially in the information age. Nor does the commission describe the type of work officers and enlisted do. The nation could accomplish that without commissioning its officers. The officer commission does not exist simply to distinguish the military’s executive class from a technical labor force. This is not just the case for the general population, but includes many officers. military officer commission is not widely or fully understood. In the ensuing discussion, it occurred to me that the U.S. While serving as a CNO Strategic Studies Group fellow more than two years ago, one of the Navy civilian technology fellows posed this to me: “Why does the Navy of the future need a distinction between officers and enlisted? Isn’t the commissioned officer an artifact that needs to be retired in the interest of eliminating such a rigid class structure?” Pay close attention to the answer often it will be incomplete. Ask any officer why he or she is commissioned into service, and why enlisted personnel are contracted into service.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |